{ "id": 2951, "date": "2022-08-22T02:31:01", "date_gmt": "2022-08-22T02:31:01", "guid": { "rendered": "https:\/\/spmcil.com\/?page_id=2951" }, "modified": "2023-03-30T10:39:12", "modified_gmt": "2023-03-30T10:39:12", "slug": "cvc-circulars-listed-in-red-book", "status": "publish", "type": "page", "link": "https:\/\/igmnoida.spmcil.com\/en\/cvc-circulars-listed-in-red-book\/", "title": { "rendered": "CVC Circulars listed in Red Book" }, "content": { "rendered": "

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

 COMMITTEE OF EXPERTS FOR SCRUTINY OF PROSECUTION SANCTIONS<\/a><\/td><\/tr>
 REFERENCE TO COMMISSION FOR ADVICE<\/a><\/td><\/tr>
 REFERENCE TO COMMISSION FOR ADVICE<\/a><\/td><\/tr>
 RECONSIDERATION OF ADVICE<\/a><\/td><\/tr>
 JURISDICTION OVER EMPLOYEES OF PSUS ETC.<\/a><\/td><\/tr>
 DIFFERENCE OF OPINION WITH CVCS ADVICE<\/a><\/td><\/tr>
 ROLE OF CVOS (ADVICES IN RESPECT OF OFFICERS OUTSIDE NORMAL JURISDICTION OF COMMISSION)<\/a><\/td><\/tr>
 DIFFERENCE OF OPINION WITH STATE ANTI CORRUPTION BUREAUS REGARDING SANCTION OF PROSECUTION<\/a><\/td><\/tr>
 PROTECTION OF OFFICIALS OF VIGILANCE UNITS<\/a><\/td><\/tr>
 ROLE AND FUNCTION OF CVOs (VIG. ANGLE)<\/a><\/td><\/tr>
 ADVICE IN LTC, LTA ETC FRAUD CASES<\/a><\/td><\/tr>
 JURISDICTION OF CVC IN RELATION TO GROUP-B OFFICERS (GAZETTED)<\/a><\/td><\/tr>
 ADVICE IN CASES NOT HAVING VIG. ANGLE<\/a><\/td><\/tr>
 DIFFERENCE OF OPINION BETWEEN CBI AND ADMINISTRATIVE AUTHORITIES<\/a><\/td><\/tr>
 NON-ACCEPTANCE OF ADVICE IN MATTER OF APPEALS<\/a><\/td><\/tr>
 ADVICE IN COMPOSITE CASES<\/a><\/td><\/tr>
 ADVANCE COPY OF CVO INVESTIGATION REPORT TO CVC<\/a><\/td><\/tr>
 VIGILANCE MANUAL<\/a><\/td><\/tr>
 CVC ACT<\/a><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>", "protected": false }, "excerpt": { "rendered": "

 COMMITTEE OF EXPERTS FOR SCRUTINY OF PROSECUTION SANCTIONS  REFERENCE TO COMMISSION FOR ADVICE  REFERENCE TO COMMISSION FOR ADVICE  RECONSIDERATION OF ADVICE  JURISDICTION OVER EMPLOYEES OF PSUS ETC.  DIFFERENCE OF OPINION WITH CVCS ADVICE  ROLE OF CVOS (ADVICES IN RESPECT OF OFFICERS OUTSIDE NORMAL JURISDICTION OF COMMISSION)  DIFFERENCE OF OPINION WITH STATE ANTI CORRUPTION BUREAUS REGARDING …<\/p>\n

CVC Circulars listed in Red Book<\/span> Read More »<\/a><\/p>", "protected": false }, "author": 3, "featured_media": 0, "parent": 0, "menu_order": 0, "comment_status": "closed", "ping_status": "closed", "template": "elementor_header_footer", "meta": { "site-sidebar-layout": "default", "site-content-layout": "default", "ast-main-header-display": "", "ast-hfb-above-header-display": "", "ast-hfb-below-header-display": "", "ast-hfb-mobile-header-display": "", "site-post-title": "", "ast-breadcrumbs-content": "", "ast-featured-img": "", "footer-sml-layout": "", "theme-transparent-header-meta": "", "adv-header-id-meta": "", "stick-header-meta": "", "header-above-stick-meta": "", "header-main-stick-meta": "", "header-below-stick-meta": "", "_vp_format_video_url": "", "_vp_image_focal_point": [] }, "_links": { "self": [ { "href": "https:\/\/igmnoida.spmcil.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2951" } ], "collection": [ { "href": "https:\/\/igmnoida.spmcil.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages" } ], "about": [ { "href": "https:\/\/igmnoida.spmcil.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page" } ], "author": [ { "embeddable": true, "href": "https:\/\/igmnoida.spmcil.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3" } ], "replies": [ { "embeddable": true, "href": "https:\/\/igmnoida.spmcil.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2951" } ], "version-history": [ { "count": 4, "href": "https:\/\/igmnoida.spmcil.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2951\/revisions" } ], "predecessor-version": [ { "id": 4698, "href": "https:\/\/igmnoida.spmcil.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2951\/revisions\/4698" } ], "wp:attachment": [ { "href": "https:\/\/igmnoida.spmcil.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2951" } ], "curies": [ { "name": "wp", "href": "https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}", "templated": true } ] } }